From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. California, San Diego

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California
Feb 4, 2013
Civil 13cv0149 WQH (MDD) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2013)

Opinion


DEREK LaVAN JACKSON, aka Lord Masters Morena, Booking #13700917, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA; SAN DIEGO; GEORGE BAILEY DETENTION FACILITY, Defendants. Civil No. 13cv0149 WQH (MDD) United States District Court, S.D. California. February 4, 2013

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILING TO PAY FILING FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

WILLIAM Q. HAYES, District Judge.

Derek LaVan Jackson, aka Lord Masters Morena ("Plaintiff"), currently detained at George Bailey Detention Facility in San Diego, and proceeding pro se, has filed a one-page document entitled "civil rights complaint" which "asks for injunctive and compensatory relief, " "10 million dollars" and a "3-judge jury." Plaintiff's sole claim is that he has been "denied access to courts, " because when he "asked a deputy for paper, " the deputy responded: "This isn't Office Depot." (Compl. at 1.)

Plaintiff claims he also "would like... to proceed in forma pauperis, " but he has not submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), or submitted a certified copy of his trust fund account statement as is required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).

I.

Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status

All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in any district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $350. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay this filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999).

Plaintiff has not prepaid the $350 filing fee required to commence a civil action, nor has he complied with 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Therefore, the action cannot yet proceed. Id.

II.

Conclusion and Order

For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby:

(1) DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failing to pay the $350 filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and

(2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $350 civil filing fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b).

Plaintiff is cautioned that if he intends to further prosecute this civil action either by paying the full filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), or moving to proceed IFP, the one-page document he has already submitted will be construed as his Complaint, screened, and is likely to be immediately dismissed insofar as it contains no "short plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, " and no "showing that [he] is entitled to relief." FED.R.CIV.P. 8(a)(1), (2). The Court must further dismiss sua sponte any prisoner complaint or IFP case which is determined to be frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim, or which seeks monetary relief from governmental defendants who are immune. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) "not only permits but requires" the court to sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that fails to state a claim); Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing sua sponte screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) of all prisoner complaints).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff with this Court's approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. " If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $350 civil filing fee or complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within that time, this action shall remain dismissed without prejudice and without further Order of the Court.


Summaries of

Jackson v. California, San Diego

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California
Feb 4, 2013
Civil 13cv0149 WQH (MDD) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Jackson v. California, San Diego

Case Details

Full title:DEREK LaVAN JACKSON, aka Lord Masters Morena, Booking #13700917…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California

Date published: Feb 4, 2013

Citations

Civil 13cv0149 WQH (MDD) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2013)