From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacks v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Sep 21, 2021
73 Va. App. 499 (Va. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Record No. 0833-20-3

09-21-2021

Clifton Thomas JACKS, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.


Upon a Petition for Rehearing En Banc

On September 7, 2021 came the appellant, by counsel, and filed a petition requesting that the Court set aside the judgment rendered herein on August 24, 2021, and grant a rehearing en banc on the issue(s) raised in the petition.

On consideration whereof and pursuant to Rule 5A:35 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, the petition for rehearing en banc is granted and the appeal of those issues is reinstated on the docket of this Court. The mandate previously entered herein is stayed pending the decision of the Court en banc.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with the schedule set forth in Rule 5A:35(b). The appellant shall attach as an addendum to the opening brief upon rehearing en banc a copy of the opinion previously rendered by the Court in this matter. An electronic version of each brief shall be filed with the Court and served on opposing counsel. It is further ordered that the appellant shall file an electronic version of the appendix previously filed in this case.

The guidelines for filing electronic briefs and appendices can be found at www.courts.state.va.us/online/vaces/resources/guidelines.pdf.


Summaries of

Jacks v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Sep 21, 2021
73 Va. App. 499 (Va. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Jacks v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Clifton Thomas JACKS, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia.

Date published: Sep 21, 2021

Citations

73 Va. App. 499 (Va. Ct. App. 2021)
862 S.E.2d 473

Citing Cases

Jacks v. Commonwealth

Jacks v. Commonwealth , 73 Va. App. 473, 861 S.E.2d 599 (2021). On Jacks's motion, this Court stayed the…

Jacks v. Commonwealth

Jacks v. Commonwealth, 73 Va.App. 473 (2021). On Jacks's motion, this Court stayed the mandate from the panel…