From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J & J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Aranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Dec 7, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM

12-07-2012

J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. RUBEN GARCIA ARANDA, et al. Defendant.

Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc.


Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.

PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; AND ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE ARMSTRONG, THE PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEY/S OF RECORD:

Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc., hereby applies ex parte for an order continuing the Initial Scheduling Conference in this action, presently set for Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 9:00 AM to a new date approximately thirty (30) to forty-five (45) days forward. This request is necessitated by the fact that the Defendant Ruben Garcia Aranda has not yet answered Plaintiff's Complaint (despite service of suit papers).

As such, as of this writing, Plaintiff has yet to receive an answer or any other responsive pleading from the defendants. As a result, Plaintiff's counsel has not conferred with the defendants concerning the claims, discovery, settlement, ADR or any of the other pertinent issues involving the case itself or the preparation of a Initial Scheduling Conference Statement.

Plaintiff is informed and believes that defendant Ruben Garcia Aranda has been served on or about November 25, 2012. As such, as of this writing Plaintiff has yet to receive an answer or any other responsive pleading from the defendant.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court continue the Initial Scheduling Conference presently scheduled for Thursday, December 13, 2012 to a new date approximately thirty (30) to forty-five (45) days forward.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C.

By: Thomas P. Riley

Attorneys for Plaintiff

J & J Sports Productions, Inc.

ORDER

The Court, having considered Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Continue Initial Scheduling, and for good cause being shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from December 13, 2012 at 9:00am to January 29, 2013 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 8 before Judge McAuliffe. A JOINT Scheduling Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in full compliance with the requirements set forth in the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference, and a copy shall be e-mailed, in WordPerfect or Word format, to bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The parties may appear by telephone. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

J & J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Aranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Dec 7, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2012)
Case details for

J & J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Aranda

Case Details

Full title:J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. RUBEN GARCIA ARANDA, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Dec 7, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2012)