From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iridex Corp. v. Alcon, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 22, 2011
Case No. CV11-02405 EJD (HRL) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV11-02405 EJD (HRL)

11-22-2011

IRIDEX CORP., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. ALCON, INC., ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., ALCON RESEARCH LTD. (all Delaware corporations) and DOES 1-5, inclusive, Defendants.

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP A. James Isbester (State Bar No. 129820) KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP Anne M. Rogaski (State Bar No. 184754) Attorneys for Plaintiff, IRIDEX CORP. WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP Thomas S. Fletcher (State Bar No. 262693) Attorneys for Defendants ALCON, INC., ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., ALCON RESEARCH, LTD.


KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

A. James Isbester (State Bar No. 129820)

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

Anne M. Rogaski (State Bar No. 184754)

Attorneys for Plaintiff, IRIDEX CORP.

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP

Thomas S. Fletcher (State Bar No. 262693)

Attorneys for Defendants ALCON, INC.,

ALCON LABORATORIES, INC.,

ALCON RESEARCH, LTD.

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

WHEREAS, Plaintiff IRIDEX Corp. ("IRIDEX") filed a Complaint for Patent Infringement ("Complaint") against Alcon, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., and Alcon Research Ltd. on May 17, 2011;

WHEREAS, Defendants Alcon Laboratories, Inc. and Alcon Research Ltd. filed an Answer to IRIDEX's Complaint on November 1, 2011; and

As a result of its acquisition by Novartis AG in April 2011, Defendant Alcon, Inc. no longer exists.

WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement of this matter.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between counsel for Plaintiff IRIDEX Corp. and Defendants Alcon Laboratories, Inc. and Alcon Research Ltd., pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), that this action be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to the claims raised by the Complaint arising prior to November 14, 2011, and without prejudice as to any claims arising after November 14, 2011, with each party to bear its own costs.

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

A. JAMES ISBESTER

ANNE M. ROGASKI

Attorneys for Plaintiff, IRIDEX CORP.

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP

THOMAS S. FLETCHER

Attorneys for Defendants ALCON, INC.,

ALCON LABORATORIES, INC.,

ALCON RESEARCH, LTD.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall close this file.

THE HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Thomas S. Fletcher.

Respectfully submitted,

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

A. JAMES ISBESTER

ANNE M. ROGASKI

Attorneys for Plaintiff, IRIDEX CORP.


Summaries of

Iridex Corp. v. Alcon, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 22, 2011
Case No. CV11-02405 EJD (HRL) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Iridex Corp. v. Alcon, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IRIDEX CORP., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. ALCON, INC., ALCON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV11-02405 EJD (HRL) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)