Opinion
NO. 01-19-00514-CV
09-05-2019
INDUSTRIAL SPECIALISTS, LLC, Appellant v. BLANCHARD REFINING COMPANY LLC and Marathon Petroleum Company LP, Appellees
Michael Anthony Golemi, James Kittrell, Jody Schisel-Meslin, Jessica Z. Barger, Michael A. Choyke, Shelley White, Houston, for Appellant. Joel Z. Montgomery, Houston, for Appellee Blanchard Refining Company. Jonathan Bruce Smith, Amy Douthitt Maddux, Houston, for Appellee Marathon Petoleum Company LP.
Michael Anthony Golemi, James Kittrell, Jody Schisel-Meslin, Jessica Z. Barger, Michael A. Choyke, Shelley White, Houston, for Appellant.
Joel Z. Montgomery, Houston, for Appellee Blanchard Refining Company.
Jonathan Bruce Smith, Amy Douthitt Maddux, Houston, for Appellee Marathon Petoleum Company LP.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Higley.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant, Industrial Specialists, LLC, has filed a petition for permissive appeal seeking to challenge an interlocutory order denying a motion for partial summary judgment in favor of appellees, Blanchard Refining Company LLC and Marathon Petroleum Company LP. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d) ; TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3. To be entitled to a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order that would not otherwise be appealable, the requesting party must establish that (1) the order to be appealed involves a "controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion" and (2) an immediate appeal from the order "may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation." TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d) ; see TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(e)(4) ; TEX. R. CIV. P. 168. Because we conclude that the petition fails to establish each requirement of Rule 28.3(3)(e)(4), we deny the petition for permissive appeal. See TEX. R. APP. 28.3(e)(4).