From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inda-Rocha v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Feb 24, 2016
369 P.3d 418 (Or. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

130710198 A156158.

02-24-2016

Humberto INDA–ROCHA, Petitioner–Appellant, v. STATE of Oregon, Defendant–Respondent.

Jason Weber argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was O'Connor Weber LLP. Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General.


Jason Weber argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was O'Connor Weber LLP.

Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General.

Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and EGAN, Judge, and SHORR, Judge.

PER CURIAM.Affirmed. Brown v. Baldwin, 131 Or.App. 356, 885 P.2d 707 (1994), rev. den., 320 Or. 507, 888 P.2d 568 (1995).


Summaries of

Inda-Rocha v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Feb 24, 2016
369 P.3d 418 (Or. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Inda-Rocha v. State

Case Details

Full title:Humberto INDA–ROCHA, Petitioner–Appellant, v. STATE of Oregon…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Feb 24, 2016

Citations

369 P.3d 418 (Or. Ct. App. 2016)
276 Or. App. 607