From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inda-Rocha v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Feb 24, 2016
No. 68 (Or. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2016)

Opinion

No. 68 A156158

02-24-2016

HUMBERTO INDA-ROCHA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Respondent.

Jason Weber argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was O'Connor Weber LLP. Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General.


Multnomah County Circuit Court
130710198;

Julie E. Frantz, Judge.

Jason Weber argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was O'Connor Weber LLP.

Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Brown v. Baldwin, 131 Or App 356, 885 P2d 707 (1994), rev den, 320 Or 507 (1995).


Summaries of

Inda-Rocha v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Feb 24, 2016
No. 68 (Or. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2016)
Case details for

Inda-Rocha v. State

Case Details

Full title:HUMBERTO INDA-ROCHA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: Feb 24, 2016

Citations

No. 68 (Or. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2016)