From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Wolff

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jul 11, 1985
494 A.2d 932 (D.C. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-932.

July 11, 1985.

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and NEBEKER, MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY and ROGERS, Associate Judges.

Associate Judge NEWMAN has recused himself from participating in this case.


ORDER


On consideration of the petition of respondent for rehearing and rehearing en banc, the opposition of the Bar Counsel and the response of the Board on Professional Responsibility thereto, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied, and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this Court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en bane, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition of respondent for rehearing en bane is granted and the opinions of April 8, 1985, 490 A.2d 1118, are vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is directed to file a brief (10 copies) within 30 days from the date of this order and Bar Counsel is directed to file a brief (10 copies) within 30 days after the brief of respondent is filed. The Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the Court sitting en bane as soon as the business of the Court permits.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Wolff

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jul 11, 1985
494 A.2d 932 (D.C. 1985)
Case details for

In the Matter of Wolff

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Peter L. WOLFF A Member of the Bar of the District of…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 11, 1985

Citations

494 A.2d 932 (D.C. 1985)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Santacruz

See Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Bd. v. Blazek, 739 N.W.2d 67, 69 (Iowa 2007); Chapman v. Gooden,…

Matter of Katz

In reRosenstein, 95 N.J. 626 (1984); see also Matter of Wolff, 490 A.2d 1118 (D.C.App. 1985), vacated, 494…