From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of William E. Gahwyler

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 20, 2011
208 N.J. 353 (N.J. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-20

In the Matter of William E. GAHWYLER, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 018291990).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11–054, concluding that WILLIAM E. GAHWYLER of MIDLAND PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be censured for violating RPC 1.2(d) (assisting a client in conduct the attorney knows to be illegal, criminal, or fraudulent), RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate the basis or rate of attorney's fee in writing), RPC 1.7(a)(1) and (2) (concurrent conflict of interest), RPC 4.1(a) (knowingly false statement of material fact to a third party), RPC 8.4(b) (criminal act that reflects adversely on the attorney's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM E. GAHWYLER is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In the Matter of William E. Gahwyler

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 20, 2011
208 N.J. 353 (N.J. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of William E. Gahwyler

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of William E. GAHWYLER, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

208 N.J. 353 (N.J. 2011)
28 A.3d 1243

Citing Cases

In re Gahwyler

In 2011, he was censured for misrepresentations on closing documents, conflict of interest, and failure to…

In re Nihamin

Relying on the following cases, counsel argued that respondent's disbarment cannot be justified. In re…