From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Valle

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
May 5, 2005
127 Wn. App. 1020 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 23982-9-III

Filed: May 5, 2005 UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Appeal from Superior Court of Yakima County. Docket No: 97-1-01216-9. Judgment or order under review. Date filed: 01/22/1998. Judge signing: Hon. Michael Leavitt.

Counsel for Petitioner(s), Miguel Rojas Valle (Appearing Pro Se), #777444, 191 Constantine Way, Aberdeen, WA 98520.

Counsel for Respondent(s), Ronald Stanton Zirkle, Attorney at Law, Yakima County Courthouse, 128 N 2nd St Rm 329, Yakima, WA 98901-2639.


Miguel Rojas Valle seeks relief from personal restraint imposed for his 1998 Yakima County conviction, pursuant to his plea of guilty, of second degree felony murder involving the predicate felony of second degree assault. Mr. Valle claims his conviction must be vacated in light of our Supreme Court's holding in In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602, 616, 56 P.3d 981 (2002), that assault may not serve as the predicate crime for second degree felony murder under former RCW 9A.32.050(1)(b) (1976).

Following the Andress decision, the legislature amended the second degree felony murder statute, effective February 12, 2003, to expressly declare that assault is included among the predicate crimes under the second degree felony murder statute. Laws of 2003, ch. 3, sec. 2.

Under the holding of In re Personal Restraint of Hinton, 152 Wn.2d 853, 861, 100 P.3d 801 (2004), the decision in Andress applies retroactively to personal restraint petitioners convicted of the crime of second degree felony murder predicated on assault. Therefore, the petitioners' judgments were facially invalid and not subject to the one-year time limit of RCW 10.73.090(1) for collateral attack. The court also held that the 2003 legislative amendment that included assault as a predicate crime for second degree felony murder was not retroactive because retroactive application would violate the ex post facto clauses of the state and federal constitutions. Hinton, 152 Wn.2d at 861. The court thus vacated the petitioners' convictions.

The State agrees that the holdings in Andress and Hinton apply to Mr. Valle's case and entitle him to relief.

Accordingly, we grant Mr. Valle's personal restraint petition to the extent that his second degree felony murder conviction and sentence is vacated and his case remanded to the Yakima County Superior Court for further lawful proceedings consistent with Andress and Hinton. Hinton, 152 Wn.2d at 861 (citing Andress, 147 Wn.2d at 617 n. 5).

The court has determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.

KATO, C.J., Concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Valle

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
May 5, 2005
127 Wn. App. 1020 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Valle

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application for Relief from Personal Restraint of…

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three

Date published: May 5, 2005

Citations

127 Wn. App. 1020 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005)
127 Wash. App. 1020