From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Mcenroe

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 7, 2002
172 N.J. 324 (N.J. 2002)

Opinion

June 7, 2002


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-154, concluding that EUGENE F. McENROE of HAZLET, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for vilating RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the court having granted the cross-petition for review filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics and having concluded that respondent's conduct also vilated RPC 8.4 (b) (conduct involving criminal act reflecting on attorney's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness to practice);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the charge of violation of RPC 8.4(b) is hereby reinstated; and it is further

ORDERED that EUGENE F. McENROE is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective July 8, 2002; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that the respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate admiinistrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Mcenroe

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 7, 2002
172 N.J. 324 (N.J. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Mcenroe

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF EUGENE F. MCENROE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 7, 2002

Citations

172 N.J. 324 (N.J. 2002)
798 A.2d 1249

Citing Cases

In re Halpern

Additionally, she maintained that the cases that the OAE cited in support of suspension are factually…

In re Simpkins

The Court, however, specifically reinstated the RPC 8.4(b) charge and found the attorney guilty of violating…