From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Carlos Abreu v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 29, 2011
87 A.D.3d 1241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-09-29

In the Matter of Carlos ABREU, Petitioner,v.Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

Carlos Abreu, Romulus, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondents.


Carlos Abreu, Romulus, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review two determinations of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging two determinations

—one rendered March 3, 2010 and the other March 9, 2010—finding him guilty of violating various disciplinary rules. Initially, we find, and the Attorney General concedes, that because petitioner raised an issue during the second hearing regarding his mental health status, it was error not to receive testimony concerning petitioner's mental condition ( see 7 NYCRR 254.6[c] ). Therefore, the March 9, 2010 determination finding petitioner guilty of lewd conduct and refusing a direct order must be reversed and expunged from petitioner's institutional record.

Turning to the March 3, 2010 determination, the misbehavior report and petitioner's testimony that he was banging on the plexi-glass cell shield with a bucket provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of creating a disturbance ( see Matter of Gentle v. Bezio, 78 A.D.3d 1398, 1399, 910 N.Y.S.2d 924 [2010]; Matter of Barham v. Goord, 42 A.D.3d 607, 608, 838 N.Y.S.2d 273 [2007] ). We reject petitioner's contention that the determination of guilt resulted from alleged hearing officer bias rather than the evidence presented ( see Black v. Goord, 12 A.D.3d 1005, 1006, 784 N.Y.S.2d 911 [2004] ). We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, including that he was denied adequate assistance, and find them to be without merit.

ADJUDGED that the March 9, 2010 determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted to that extent and respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner's institutional record.

ADJUDGED that the March 3, 2010 determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed to that extent.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Carlos Abreu v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 29, 2011
87 A.D.3d 1241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Carlos Abreu v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Carlos ABREU, Petitioner,v.Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 29, 2011

Citations

87 A.D.3d 1241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
930 N.Y.S.2d 301
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6616

Citing Cases

Bilal v. Fischer

As a result, he received a second misbehavior report charging him with possession of unauthorized medication…

Sanchez v. Fischer

We confirm. The misbehavior report, hearing testimony and confidential information provide substantial…