From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kevin Gentle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 509192.

November 18, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Kevin Gentle, Napanoch, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spain, J.P., Rose, Kavanagh, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, was informed that he would be leaving the facility where he was incarcerated for a 10-day medical trip and was placed in a holding area while correction officers packed items from his cell. When petitioner came to believe that he was being taken for a court appearance rather than a medical trip, he became irate and objected in a loud and profane manner. Petitioner was given several direct orders to calm down, but he failed to comply. As a result, he was served with a misbehavior report and, after a tier III disciplinary hearing, was found guilty of creating a disturbance and refusing a direct order. That determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, after which petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report — authored by a correction officer who witnessed the incident — and the testimony adduced at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Weems v Fischer, 75 AD3d 681, 682; Matter of Mclver v Fischer, 62 AD3d 1174). Although petitioner argues that the testimony of the correction officers controverts the allegations in the misbehavior report, we note that these witnesses only interacted with petitioner in his cell before he was taken to the holding cell; by petitioner's own admission, they were not present at the holding cell where the behavior that gave rise to the misbehavior report occurred.

Petitioner's remaining arguments have been found to be unpreserved or without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Kevin Gentle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Kevin Gentle

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KEVIN GENTLE, Petitioner, v. NORMAN R. BEZIO, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 18, 2010

Citations

78 A.D.3d 1398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8410
910 N.Y.S.2d 924

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Carlos Abreu v. Fischer

Therefore, the March 9, 2010 determination finding petitioner guilty of lewd conduct and refusing a direct…

In re Kenneth Goodman

We confirm. The misbehavior report and hearing testimony of both petitioner and the correction officer who…