From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Youngblood

Court of Appeals of Texas
Feb 22, 2012
No. 04-12-00065-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 22, 2012)

Opinion

No. 04-12-00065-CR

02-22-2012

IN RE Johnny Lee YOUNGBLOOD


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Original Mandamus Proceeding

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CR-8218, styled State of Texas v. Johnny Lee Youngblood, pending in the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Roman presiding.

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 31, 2012, relator Johnny Lee Youngblood filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court's failure to rule on his various pro se motions. However, counsel has been appointed to represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See Robinson, 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule on relator's pro se motions filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH


Summaries of

In re Youngblood

Court of Appeals of Texas
Feb 22, 2012
No. 04-12-00065-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 22, 2012)
Case details for

In re Youngblood

Case Details

Full title:IN RE Johnny Lee YOUNGBLOOD

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 22, 2012

Citations

No. 04-12-00065-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 22, 2012)