From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Walston

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District
Dec 6, 2004
No. 10-04-00354-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 6, 2004)

Opinion

No. 10-04-00354-CV

Opinion delivered and filed December 6, 2004.

Original Proceeding.

Sue Walston, Pro Se, Waco, TX, for Appellant/Relator.

Jim Dunnam, Dunnam Dunnam, Waco, TX, for Appellee/Respondent.

Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice VANCE, and Justice REYNA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Even if the severance of the third party defendants was improper and may impact the appeal, we would be unable to grant the primary relief that the petitioner desires; that is, to reach the merits of the trial court's rulings and reverse the judgments and orders which denied or dismissed petitioner's requested relief against those third party defendants. Thus, even with the prospect of a fifth trial, the petition for mandamus is denied.

The motion for emergency relief is dismissed.

(Justice Vance concurring in the result only) Writ denied


Summaries of

In re Walston

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District
Dec 6, 2004
No. 10-04-00354-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 6, 2004)
Case details for

In re Walston

Case Details

Full title:In re Sue Walston

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District

Date published: Dec 6, 2004

Citations

No. 10-04-00354-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 6, 2004)

Citing Cases

In re Marriage of Walston

See Walston v. Walston, 119 S.W.3d 435 (Tex.App.-Waco 2003, no pet.); Walston v. Walston, 971 S.W.2d 687…