From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Trevino

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Feb 14, 2013
NO. 01-13-00119-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 14, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 01-13-00119-CRNO. 01-13-00120-CR

02-14-2013

IN RE RAUL ADAM TREVINO, Relator


Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Raul Adam Treviño has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, asking this Court to order the trial court, the Harris County District Clerk, and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) to stop interfering with his efforts to collect evidence to challenge his final felony convictions by petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Relator has identified the underlying case as State v. Treviño, Nos. 9425377 and 9425398 in the 209th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michael T. McSpadden presiding.

This Court has mandamus jurisdiction against a district court judge or a county court judge in our district, and we may issue all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004). We have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk or the TDCJ except to protect our jurisdiction. In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). Treviño has not shown that the issuance of a writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce this Court's jurisdiction.

Moreover, with respect to the relief requested against the trial court, Treviño's petition indicates that the documents he seeks are for use in a post-conviction proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2012). We have no authority to issue writs of mandamus in criminal law matters pertaining to habeas corpus proceedings in which relief is sought from a final felony judgment. That jurisdiction lies exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717-18 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

In re Trevino

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Feb 14, 2013
NO. 01-13-00119-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 14, 2013)
Case details for

In re Trevino

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RAUL ADAM TREVINO, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Feb 14, 2013

Citations

NO. 01-13-00119-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 14, 2013)