Summary
determining that trial court's order specifying the minimum frequency and length of the visitation satisfied Section 7B-905.1, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the child's foster parents to determine details of visitation between the child and her parents
Summary of this case from In re N.T.Opinion
No. COA15–866.
01-19-2016
In the Matter of T.H. and M.B.
Michael E. Casterline, for respondent-appellant mother. Perry, Bundy, Plyler & Long, LLP, by Natalie J. Broadway and Dale Ann Plyler, for petitioner-appellee. Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, by Christopher M. Thomas and Collier R. Marsh, for guardian ad litem.
Case Reported Without Published Opinion
Affirmed.