From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 2010
75 A.D.3d 150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. M1821.

June 8, 2010.

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS instituted by the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department. Respondent was admitted to the bar on June 20, 1979 at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department as Graham Roderick Taylor.

Alan W. Friedberg, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee, New York City ( Raymond Vallejo of counsel), for petitioner. Graham R. Taylor, respondent pro se.

Before: TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, NARDELLI, ACOSTA and ABDUS-SALAAM, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Respondent Graham Roderick Taylor was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on June 20, 1979. He resides in California where he is also admitted to the bar.

On January 24, 2008, respondent was convicted, upon a guilty plea, in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 USC § 371, a felony under the United States Code, for his participation in a tax fraud scheme extending from 1997 to 2003, in which he devised, marketed, and implemented a tax shelter in aiding two clients to evade income taxes. On October 29, 2009, respondent was sentenced to three years' probation and a $125,000 fine.

The Disciplinary Committee seeks an order accepting respondent's affidavit of resignation from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.11 and striking his name from the roll of attorneys. Respondent has fully complied with the requirements of section 603.11. Specifically, he acknowledges that he is the subject of an investigation by the Disciplinary Committee into allegations of professional misconduct arising from his federal conviction, he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against any charges predicated upon those allegations, he submits his resignation freely, voluntarily and without coercion or duress, and he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation.

Respondent, who is proceeding pro se, has submitted an application to resign from the California bar, which is currently pending.

This Court has previously accepted resignations of attorneys who have pleaded guilty to federal felonies ( see e.g. Matter of Palazzolo, 38 AD3d 66 [resignation accepted of attorney who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud]; Matter of Bolan, 28 AD3d 172 [resignation accepted of attorney who pleaded guilty to misprision of a felony]; Matter of Percy, 14 AD3d 26 [resignation accepted of attorney who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States]).

Accordingly, the petition should be granted pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.11 and respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys in New York, effective nunc pro tunc to December 12, 2009.

Respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, nunc pro tunc to December 12, 2009.


Summaries of

In re Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 2010
75 A.D.3d 150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Taylor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GRAHAM R. TAYLOR (Admitted as GRAHAM RODERICK TAYLOR), an…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 8, 2010

Citations

75 A.D.3d 150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4869
901 N.Y.S.2d 842

Citing Cases

In re Wise

By affirmation dated June 15, 2023, the AGC states that it does not oppose respondent's application because…

In re Van Doren

Respondent understands further that, in the event the Court accepts his resignation, the order resulting from…