From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Corey S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 19, 2016
139 A.D.3d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

1186.

05-19-2016

In re COREY S., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Diane Pazar of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Benjamin Welikson of counsel), for presentment agency.


Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Diane Pazar of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Benjamin Welikson of counsel), for presentment agency.

Opinion Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Stewart H. Weinstein, J.), entered on or about March 27, 2015, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him on probation for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility and identification. A forcible taking was established by evidence that appellant and his companions made express and implied threats of violence for the purpose of causing the victim to acquiesce in the removal of property from his person. SWEENY, J.P., RENWICK, ANDRIAS, KAPNICK, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Corey S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 19, 2016
139 A.D.3d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Corey S.

Case Details

Full title:In re Corey S., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 19, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
30 N.Y.S.3d 551
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3962

Citing Cases

In re Tyshawn B.

, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 ) that the showup identification of the appellant was properly conducted…

In re Tyshawn B.

The presentment agency established at the Wade hearing (see United States v Wade, 388 US 218) that the showup…