From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Simpkins

DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 31, 2011
Docket No. DRB 11-258 (N.J. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

Docket No. DRB 11-258

10-31-2011

RE: In the Matter of Darryl W. Simpkins

LOUIS PASHMAN, ESQ. CHAIR BONNIE C. FROST, ESQ. VICE-CHAIR EDNAY. BAUGH, ESQ. BRUCE W. CLARK, ESQ. JEANNE DOREMUS HON. REGINALD STANTON SPENCER V. WISSINGER, III MORRIS YAMNER, ESQ. ROBERT C. ZMIRICH JULIANNE K. DECORE CHIEF COUNSEL ISABEL FRANK DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL ELLEN A. BRODSKY FIRST ASSISTANT COUNSEL LILLIAN LEWIN DONA S. SEROTA -TESCHNER COLIN T. TAMS KATHRYN ANNE WINTERLE ASSISTANT COUNSEL


LOUIS PASHMAN, ESQ. CHAIR
BONNIE C. FROST, ESQ. VICE-CHAIR
EDNAY. BAUGH, ESQ.
BRUCE W. CLARK, ESQ.
JEANNE DOREMUS
HON. REGINALD STANTON
SPENCER V. WISSINGER, III
MORRIS YAMNER, ESQ.
ROBERT C. ZMIRICH JULIANNE K. DECORE
CHIEF COUNSEL ISABEL FRANK
DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL ELLEN A. BRODSKY
FIRST ASSISTANT COUNSEL LILLIAN LEWIN
DONA S. SEROTA -TESCHNER
COLIN T. TAMS
KATHRYN ANNE WINTERLE
ASSISTANT COUNSEL

RICHARD J. HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL , R.R.R.; REGULAR MAIL Darryl W. Simpkins, Esq.
Simpkins & Simpkins
856 Route 206
Hillsborough, NJ 08844 District Docket No. XIII-2010-0010E
LETTER OF ADMONITION Dear Mr. Simpkins:

The Disciplinary Review Board reviewed the motion for discipline by consent (admonition), filed by the District Ethics XIII Committee, pursuant to R. 1:20-10. Following a review of the record, the Board determined to grant the motion and to impose an admonition.

Specifically, Marcia Gladden retained you in 2001 to represent her for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Despite your obligation to represent your client's interests diligently, you never filed a complaint on her behalf, a violation of RPC 1.3. You also failed, after 2002, to adequately communicate with your client, who made numerous telephone calls to you, requesting information about the matter. Your failure to reply to Gladden's reasonable requests for information after 2002 constituted a violation of RPC 1.4(b).

Your conduct adversely reflected not only upon you as an attorney, but also upon all members of the bar. Accordingly, the Board has directed the issuance of this admonition to you. R. 1:20-15(f)(4).

In imposing only an admonition, the Board considered that this is your first brush with the disciplinary system in twenty-seven years at the bar.

A permanent record of this occurrence has been filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and the Board's office. Should you become the subject of any further discipline, it will be taken into consideration.

The Board has also directed that the costs of the disciplinary proceedings be assessed against you. An invoice of costs will be forwarded under separate cover.

Very truly yours,

/s/

Julianne K. DeCore

Chief Counsel JKD/sj

c. Chief Justice Stuart Rabner

Associate Justices

Louis Pashman, Chair

Disciplinary Review Board

Mark Neary, Clerk

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Gail G. Haney, Deputy Clerk

Supreme Court of New Jersey (w/ethics history)

Charles Centinaro, Director

Office of Attorney Ethics

Tara L. Johnson, Chair, District XIII Ethics Committee

Donna P. Legband, Secretary, District XIII Ethics Committee

Marcia Gladden, Grievant


Summaries of

In re Simpkins

DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 31, 2011
Docket No. DRB 11-258 (N.J. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

In re Simpkins

Case Details

Full title:RE: In the Matter of Darryl W. Simpkins

Court:DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

Docket No. DRB 11-258 (N.J. Oct. 31, 2011)

Citing Cases

In re Simpkins

He also failed to reply to the majority of the client's numerous requests for information about the status of…

In re Pinnock

See, e.g., In the Matters of Peter A. Cook, DRB 12-290 and DRB 12-331 (January 25, 2013) (attorney lacked…