Opinion
No. 20-2304
04-26-2021
In re: STARSHA SEWELL, Appellant.
Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-mc-00114) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Starsha Sewell appeals the district court's order returning certain pleadings to her pursuant to a previously imposed prefiling injunction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sewell's informal brief and various supplements do not challenge the district court's rationale, she has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We deny Sewell's motion for enforcement. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
To the extent that Sewell contests the prefiling injunction, we note that this court previously affirmed that order. See In re Sewell, 732 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2018) (No. 18-1298). --------
AFFIRMED