From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sewell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 26, 2018
No. 18-1298 (4th Cir. Jul. 26, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-1298

07-26-2018

In re: STARSHA M. SEWELL, Appellant.

Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-mc-00114) Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court's order imposing a prefiling injunction after considering Sewell's response to a show cause order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re Sewell, No. 1:18-mc-00114 (D. Md. Mar. 6, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

In re Sewell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 26, 2018
No. 18-1298 (4th Cir. Jul. 26, 2018)
Case details for

In re Sewell

Case Details

Full title:In re: STARSHA M. SEWELL, Appellant.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 26, 2018

Citations

No. 18-1298 (4th Cir. Jul. 26, 2018)

Citing Cases

In re Sewell

To the extent that Sewell contests the prefiling injunction, we note that this court previously affirmed that…