From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Schaefer v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 2001
281 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 1, 2001.

Determinations of respondent Commissioner, dated May 26, 1999 and August 16, 1999, respectively, which, after separate hearings, directed petitioner's forfeiture of 25 vacation days and his suspension without pay for 15 days, respectively, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Louise Gruner Gans, J.], entered January 14, 2000) dismissed, without costs.

Howard B. Sterinbach, for petitioner.

Julie Steiner, for respondents.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Andrias, Wallach, Rubin, Buckley, JJ.


There was substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. Of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 181) to support the specifications charging petitioner with three counts of improper searches, one count of failing to give his shield number when requested to do so and one count of use of excessive force. Petitioner's challenges to the credibility determinations of the Administrative Law Judges are unavailing since, in an article 78 proceeding, "[i]t is axiomatic that the [reviewing] court may not weigh the evidence, choose between conflicting proof, or substitute its assessment of the evidence or credibility of the witnesses for that of the Administrative Law Judge or hearing panel" (Lindemann v. Am. Horse Shows Assn., Inc., 222 A.D.2d 248, 250, see also, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443-444). In any event, the Administrative Law Judges in these matters were perfectly justified in crediting the testimony of the complaining witnesses and rejecting the testimony of petitioner and his witnesses. Finally, the penalties imposed are not shocking to our sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Bd. Of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Schaefer v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 2001
281 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In re Schaefer v. Safir

Case Details

Full title:IN RE APPLICATION OF POLICE OFFICER JOHN SCHAEFER, ETC., PETITIONER, FOR A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 231

Citing Cases

In re Application of Edwards v. Safir

There was substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176,…

In re Application of Asaro v. Kerik

The IAS court improperly undertook to evaluate whether substantial evidence supported respondents'…