From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Application of Edwards v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 17, 2001
282 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

April 17, 2001.

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated April 12, 1999, which upon two findings that petitioner had been insubordinate, placed petitioner on probationary dismissal and imposed a forfeiture of 15 vacation days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Richard Braun, J.], entered March 20, 2000), dismissed, without costs.

Howard B. Sterinbach, for Petitioner.

Jane L. Gordon, for Respondents.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Andrias, Ellerin, Rubin, Buckley, JJ.


There was substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 181), to support the specifications charging petitioner with two separate counts of insubordination. Petitioner's challenges to the credibility determinations of the Assistant Deputy Commissioner are unavailing since, in an article 78 proceeding, the reviewing court may not weigh the evidence, choose between conflicting proof, or substitute its assessment of the evidence or witness credibility for that of the administrative fact-finder (Matter of Schaefer v. Safir, 281 A.D.2d 163, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1924). In any case, the ADC was entirely justified in crediting the testimony of petitioner's superior officers and rejecting that of petitioner.

The penalty imposed does not shock our sense of fairness.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Application of Edwards v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 17, 2001
282 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In re Application of Edwards v. Safir

Case Details

Full title:IN RE APPLICATION OF STEPHANIE EDWARDS, ETC., PETITIONER, FOR A JUDGMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 17, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 355

Citing Cases

Maniscalco v. The Bd. of Educ. of City Sch. Dist. of the City of New York

Substantive Article 78 arguments In an Article 78 proceeding, a reviewing court may not weigh evidence,…