From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Riley

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District
Mar 21, 2024
No. 10-24-00072-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 21, 2024)

Opinion

10-24-00072-CR

03-21-2024

IN RE CODY JAY RILEY


Do not publish

Original Proceeding

From the 413th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. F45054

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice

Relator's "Petition for Writ of Mandamus" was filed on March 11, 2024. There are procedural problems with this petition, such as no service on the trial court judge as the respondent and no service on the State as the real-party-in-interest, no certification, no record, and no certified or sworn-to copy of any document showing the matter complained of as required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5, 52.3(j), (k)(1)(A), and 52.7. However, to expedite this decision, we use Rule 2 to suspend the operation of these rules and proceed to a disposition of the petition. See Tex. R. App. P. 2.

We do not serve documents for parties, even if indigent and in prison. Relator could handwrite extra copies of the petition and serve those copies on the respondent and real-party-in-interest.

Because the petition and/or brief was apparently never filed, there is nothing that prevents the petitioner from again seeking the appointment of counsel to file an application for a writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to the petitioner's ability to file a motion for the appointment of counsel in the trial court.

Petition denied


Summaries of

In re Riley

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District
Mar 21, 2024
No. 10-24-00072-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 21, 2024)
Case details for

In re Riley

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CODY JAY RILEY

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District

Date published: Mar 21, 2024

Citations

No. 10-24-00072-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 21, 2024)