From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re of Ferrando v. New York City Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 23, 2004
12 A.D.3d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4688

November 23, 2004.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered on or about October 7, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging respondent's denial of petitioner's appeal which had sought revocation of a certificate of occupancy, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Lerner and Catterson, JJ.


Petitioner's failure to join the owner of the premises for which the disputed certificate of occupancy was issued constituted a failure to join a necessary party ( see Matter of Manupella v. Troy City Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 272 AD2d 761). Since the applicable statutory period has expired and the owner can no longer be joined, and proceeding in his absence would potentially be highly prejudicial to him, the proceeding was properly dismissed ( see CPLR 1001, 1003). We note that, contrary to petitioner's argument, the "relation back" doctrine has no application to this matter since, inter alia, it is evident that petitioner's nonjoinder of the premises owner was deliberate and not attributable to an "excusable mistake" ( see Buran v. Coupal, 87 NY2d 173, 178).


Summaries of

In re of Ferrando v. New York City Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 23, 2004
12 A.D.3d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In re of Ferrando v. New York City Board

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHARLES FERRANDO, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 23, 2004

Citations

12 A.D.3d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
785 N.Y.S.2d 62

Citing Cases

W. 60th St. Rlty. Partners v. Attorney Gen.

Generally, when a necessary party to an Article 78 proceeding has not been timely served, the proceeding…

Swezey v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 2009 NY Slip Op 32650(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 11/5/2009)

Although there is no explicit requirement in Article 52 that a petitioner join adverse claimants in a…