From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mormin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 2009
66 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-02344.

October 6, 2009.

In a probate proceeding, in which a judicial settlement was sought, Weitz Luxenberg, P.C., the current attorney for the parents of the deceased Kevin Jean Henri Paul Mormin appeals from a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Suffolk County (Czygier, S.), entered January 28, 2008, which directed it to pay Stephen Civardi, P.C., the former attorney for the parents of the deceased Kevin Jean Henri Paul Mormin 20% of the gross attorney's fees earned from the settlement of the underlying action, among other things, to recover damages for the wrongful death of Kevin Jean Henri Paul Mormin.

Weitz Luxenberg, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Lawrence Goldhirsch of counsel), nonparty-appellant pro se.

Steven Civardi, P.C., Freeport, N.Y. (Richard C. Obiol of counsel), nonparty-respondent pro se.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Balkin, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by Weitz Luxenberg, P.C.

Where an attorney is discharged without cause, the attorney may recover in quantum meruit the reasonable value of the services rendered ( see Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 44; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60; Bruk v Albin, 270 AD2d 441, 442). "The determination of what constitutes a reasonable attorney's fee is left to the sound discretion of the surrogate, `who is in a far superior position to judge those factors integral to the fixing of counsel fees, such as the time, effort, and skill required'" [ Matter of Tendler, 12 AD3d 520, 521, quoting Matter of Pekofsky v Estate of Cohen, 259 AD2d 702, 702; see Clifford v Pierce, 214 AD2d 697, 698).

Here, contrary to the appellant's contention, the Surrogate's Court providently exercised its discretion in fixing the fee of Stephen Civardi, P.C., at the sum of $58,777.82, which was 20% of the total attorney's fee ( see Clifford v Pierce, 214 AD2d at 698).

The appellant's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.


Summaries of

In re Mormin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 2009
66 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Mormin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Estate of KEVIN JEAN HENRI PAUL MORMIN, Deceased. WEITZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7260
886 N.Y.S.2d 479

Citing Cases

In re Stanley Mintz

Ordered that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Contrary to the…