From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Monce

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Jun 27, 2024
No. 13-24-00319-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2024)

Opinion

13-24-00319-CV

06-27-2024

IN RE ED MONCE


ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DORI CONTRERAS CHIEF JUSTICE

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case."); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Relator Ed Monce filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to vacate a temporary restraining order and an extension order; however, relator has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for writ of mandamus. According to the unopposed motion to dismiss, relator has reached an agreement with real parties in interest Christopher Majka, Tressa Majka, and Esplanade Investments L.L.C. that disposes of the necessity of seeking mandamus relief.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we lift the stay previously imposed in this case, we grant the unopposed motion to dismiss, and we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10.


Summaries of

In re Monce

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Jun 27, 2024
No. 13-24-00319-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2024)
Case details for

In re Monce

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ED MONCE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg

Date published: Jun 27, 2024

Citations

No. 13-24-00319-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2024)