From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Meeks

Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana
May 18, 2022
No. 06-22-00033-CV (Tex. App. May. 18, 2022)

Opinion

06-22-00033-CV

05-18-2022

IN RE JAMES ARTHUR MEEKS, III


Submitted: May 17, 2022

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and van Cleef, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice.

In this original proceeding, Relator, James Arthur Meeks, III, asks that we issue a writ of mandamus directing Fannin County District Attorney Richard Glaser, Fannin County Sheriff's Chief Deputy Nick Tredway, and Fannin County Commissioner Jerry Magness, or their designated representatives, to produce certain documents or records.

Meeks seeks the following: (1) from Chief Deputy Nick Tredway, medical clearance pertaining to Meeks's arrest and admission to the Fannin County detention center, (2) from District Attorney Richard Glaser, documents relating to Meeks's criminal complaint regarding a July 21, 2021, incident, and (3) from Commissioner Jerry Magness, itemized monetary expenditures for Fannin County detention centers.

Article V, Section 6, of the Texas Constitution defines appellate jurisdiction of the courts of appeals, stating that they "shall have such other jurisdiction, original and appellate, as may be prescribed by law." Tex. Const. art. V, § 6(a). Section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code explains that appellate courts may issue writs of mandamus against certain judges in their districts "and all other writs necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court." Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b) (Supp.). The officials from which Meeks seeks documents are not judges. Also, nothing in the record presented indicates that the issuance of a writ of mandamus is necessary to preserve our jurisdiction. Consequently, we have no authority to consider the merits of Meeks's petition seeking relief against the Fannin County district attorney, a sheriff's deputy, and a county commissioner. Accordingly, we dismiss Meeks's petition for a writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

In re Meeks

Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana
May 18, 2022
No. 06-22-00033-CV (Tex. App. May. 18, 2022)
Case details for

In re Meeks

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JAMES ARTHUR MEEKS, III

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana

Date published: May 18, 2022

Citations

No. 06-22-00033-CV (Tex. App. May. 18, 2022)

Citing Cases

In re Morgan

We do not have writ jurisdiction over a district clerk or chief deputy unless it is necessary to enforce our…