From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re McG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 2009
68 A.D.3d 1118 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2007-10408.

December 22, 2009.

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 to appoint a guardian for the person and property of James A. McG., an alleged incapacitated person, the petitioner appeals from a money judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Sgroi, J.), entered January 2, 2008, which, after a hearing, and upon an order of the same court dated June 12, 2007, and an order and judgment (one paper) of the same court dated July 17, 2007, is in favor of Ralph M. Randazzo and against her in the sum of $4,375, for legal services rendered as a court evaluator.

Catherine M. Robinson, Cambridge, Massachusetts, appellant pro se.

Ralph M. Randazzo, Huntington, N.Y., nonparty-respondent pro se.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Florio, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal dated September 11, 2007 is deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from the money judgment entered January 2, 2008 ( see CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the money judgment entered January 2, 2008 is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by reducing the award in favor of Ralph M. Randazzo and against the petitioner for legal services rendered as a court evaluator from the sum of $4,375, to the sum of $1,458.33, representing a one-third share of the fee for legal services rendered as a court evaluator; as so modified, the money judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, the order and judgment dated July 17, 2007 is modified accordingly, and the order dated June 12, 2007 is vacated.

Under the circumstances of this case, we deem it appropriate for the petitioner to pay a one-third share of the fee for the legal services performed by the court evaluator in this matter, rather than the entire amount of the fee ( see Mental Hygiene Law § 81.09 [f]).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

In re McG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 2009
68 A.D.3d 1118 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re McG

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES A. McG., an Alleged Incapacitated Person. CATHERINE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 2009

Citations

68 A.D.3d 1118 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 9663
890 N.Y.S.2d 345

Citing Cases

In re Nicole L.

party moves to discontinue the Article 81 guardianship proceeding, and the discontinuance is stipulated to…

In re Laurence H.

The attorneys for the parties, the court evaluator, and counsel for the daughter for the AIP all submitted…