From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re McCoy-Jacien

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 16, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-16-2017

In the Matter of Phyllis R. McCOY–JACIEN, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 2908028).

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., ROSE, CLARK and AARONS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1998, after having previously been admitted in Vermont in 1989. In July 2016, respondent was publically reprimanded and a six-month term of probation was imposed by a Hearing Panel of the Vermont Professional Responsibility Board due to her failure to file income taxes in Vermont from 2011 through 2014. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) now moves to impose discipline upon respondent in this state by reason of the discipline imposed upon her in Vermont. Respondent has not replied or otherwise responded to AGC's motion or raised any of the available defenses (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.13 [b] ); therefore, we grant the motion (see Matter of Bailey, 145 A.D.3d 1182, 1182, 41 N.Y.S.3d 445 [2016] ; Matter of Halbfish, 78 A.D.3d 1320, 1321, 909 N.Y.S.2d 675 [2010] ).

Turning to the appropriate discipline to be imposed, upon consideration of all the facts and circumstances, including the discipline imposed in Vermont, we hold that, in order to protect the public, maintain the honor and integrity of the profession and deter others from committing similar misconduct, respondent should be censured in this state (see Matter of Laser, 131 A.D.3d 1336, 1337, 16 N.Y.S.3d 635 [2015] ; Matter of Nimmer, 112 A.D.3d 1137, 1138, 976 N.Y.S.2d 420 [2013] ).

ORDERED that the motion of the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is censured.

McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., ROSE, CLARK and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re McCoy-Jacien

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 16, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re McCoy-Jacien

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Phyllis R. McCOY–JACIEN, an Attorney. (Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 16, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 1420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
48 N.Y.S.3d 645

Citing Cases

In re McCoy-Jacien

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1998 and was previously admitted to practice in Vermont…

In re McCoy-Jacien

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1998, after having previously been admitted in Vermont…