From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re McCoy-Jacien

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 12, 2020
181 A.D.3d 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

PM-41-20

03-12-2020

In the MATTER OF Phyllis R. MCCOY–JACIEN, a Suspended Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 2908028)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Devine, Aarons and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Per Curiam. Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1998, after having previously been admitted in Vermont in 1989. In March 2017, we censured respondent upon a finding of misconduct in Vermont due to her failure to file income taxes in that state over a four-year period ( 148 A.D.3d 1420 [2017] ). Respondent was later suspended in Vermont for a nine-month term due to her failure to comply with certain conditions imposed upon her as part of the earlier disciplinary proceeding, and we accordingly suspended her for a one-year term in December 2018 due to her Vermont misconduct (167 A.D.3d 1414, 90 N.Y.S.3d 367 [2018] ).

Alleging her failure to cooperate with two separate investigations, the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) moved to suspend respondent from the practice of law for engaging in conduct immediately threatening the public interest pursuant to Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters ( 22 NYCRR) § 1240.9(a)(1), (3) and (5) and Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.9. Respondent did not respond to the motion and this Court granted same and again suspended respondent by August 2019 order (175 A.D.3d 801, 105 N.Y.S.3d 225 [2019] ). Respondent remains suspended to date.

We note respondent's failure to submit an affidavit of compliance with that order in contravention of Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) § 1240.15(f).
--------

AGC now moves, pursuant to Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters ( 22 NYCRR) § 1240.9(b), to disbar respondent and strike her name from the roll of attorneys due to her failure to respond or appear for further investigatory or disciplinary proceedings for a period of more than six months since the date of her interim suspension. Although AGC was not required to provide notice to respondent of the instant motion, it nonetheless did so and respondent has nevertheless failed to respond, indicating her lack of interest in her fate as an attorney in this state. Accordingly, we find, under the circumstances, that respondent should be disbarred (see Matter of Fritzsch, 170 A.D.3d 1422, 1422, 95 N.Y.S.3d 662 [2019], lv dismissed 34 N.Y.3d 943, 110 N.Y.S.3d 395, 134 N.E.3d 136 [2019] ; Matter of Battaglia, 166 A.D.3d 1281, 1282, 85 N.Y.S.3d 894 [2018] ; Matter of DiStefano, 161 A.D.3d 1444, 1445, 73 N.Y.S.3d 771 [2018] ; Matter of Croak, 156 A.D.3d 1111, 1112, 65 N.Y.S.3d 467 [2017], appeal dismissed 31 N.Y.3d 997, 74 N.Y.S.3d 158, 97 N.E.3d 707 [2018] ; Matter of Nichols, 152 A.D.3d 1044, 1045, 55 N.Y.S.3d 922 [2017] ).

Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Devine, Aarons and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the motion of the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is disbarred and her name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of the Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys and shall duly certify to the same in her affidavit of compliance (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.15 ).


Summaries of

In re McCoy-Jacien

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 12, 2020
181 A.D.3d 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

In re McCoy-Jacien

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Phyllis R. McCoy-Jacien, a Suspended Attorney.

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 12, 2020

Citations

181 A.D.3d 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
181 A.D.3d 1089
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 1692