From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Matter of Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 2007
37 A.D.3d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 277.

February 20, 2007.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered September 6, 2005, which granted the respondents' cross motion to dismiss this proceeding, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about May 24, 2006, which, to the extent appealable, denied petitioner's motion to renew the earlier disposition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Olonoff, Asen Serebro, LLP, New York (Michael Ira Asen of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Sharyn Rootenberg of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Malone and Kavanagh, JJ.


Petitioner, who was on probation for prior misconduct, failed to sustain his burden of establishing by competent evidence that his termination as a correction officer was in bad faith or for illegal reasons ( see Matter of Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, 762-763). Indeed, his lateness and absenteeism, both of which were admitted in his petition, provided a proper basis for dismissal of the proceeding ( Matter of Nelson v Abate, 205 AD2d 454). Furthermore, the rule cited in petitioner's renewal motion does not require respondent to wait until completion of the initial probationary term before dismissing a probationary employee.


Summaries of

In re Matter of Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 2007
37 A.D.3d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

In re Matter of Santiago

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DANACI SANTIAGO, Appellant, v. MARTIN F. HORN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 20, 2007

Citations

37 A.D.3d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 1405
830 N.Y.S.2d 119

Citing Cases

John v. Brann

New York law does permit John to challenge DOC's termination decision on the ground that the Department made…

Naranjo v. Brann

The court notes that Naranjo himself admitted that he had used "more than 100 sick days during the first…