In re Marriage of Janet E.

Full title: JANET E. BURKLE, Respondent, v. RONALD W. BURKLE, Appellant

Court: California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division

Date published: Feb 1, 2006

No. B181878 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2006)

Opinion

In re the Marriage of JANET E. and RONALD W. BURKLE. JANET E. BURKLE, Respondent, v. RONALD W. BURKLE, Appellant B181878 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Eighth Division February 1, 2006

Filed 2/1/06 (Corrected Opn. title)

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BD390479.

THE COURT^*:

* COOPER, P.J. RUBIN, J. BOLAND, J.

The opinion filed on January 20, 2006, is hereby modified.

On page 23, the fourth line in the first paragraph, replace “identify� with “identity� so that the sentence now reads “Mr. Burkle asserts that the legislative history of section 2024.6 is “replete� with evidence of the Legislature’s concern about the risk of the identity theft and other misuse of the personal financial information which divorcing parties must disclose.�

The modification requires no change in the judgment.