From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kearney

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi
Aug 18, 2004
No. 13-04-404-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2004)

Opinion

No. 13-04-404-CR

Opinion delivered and filed August 18, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Before Justices HINOJOSA, GARZA, and WITTIG

Retired Justice Don Wittig assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to the government code. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 74.003 (Vernon Supp. 2004).


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator, John Kearney, attorney, filed a motion for emergency stay and petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on August 5, 2004. On August 5, 2004, the Court granted the motion for emergency stay and requested a response from the real parties in interest, LuAnn Whitehead and the State of Texas, and respondent, the Honorable J. Manuel Banales. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response from the real party in interest is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8. Our stay of the trial court proceedings is hereby ordered LIFTED. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.


Summaries of

In re Kearney

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi
Aug 18, 2004
No. 13-04-404-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2004)
Case details for

In re Kearney

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JOHN KEARNEY, Attorney

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi

Date published: Aug 18, 2004

Citations

No. 13-04-404-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2004)