From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Glenewinkel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Sep 29, 2021
No. 04-21-00299-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 29, 2021)

Opinion

04-21-00299-CV

09-29-2021

IN RE Douglas C. GLENEWINKEL and Ward A. Glenewinkel, Relator(s)


Original Proceeding

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 21-0921-CV-E, styled Douglas C. Glenewinkel and Ward. A. Glenewinkel v. Marvin W. Kraft, Jr., Jeffrey Marvin Kraft and Craig W. Hall, pending in the 456th District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Heather H. Wright presiding.

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice, Irene Rios, Justice, Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On July 26, 2021, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief, which this court granted on July 29, 2021. The real parties in interest filed a response to which relators replied. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relators did not show they are entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Glenewinkel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Sep 29, 2021
No. 04-21-00299-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 29, 2021)
Case details for

In re Glenewinkel

Case Details

Full title:IN RE Douglas C. GLENEWINKEL and Ward A. Glenewinkel, Relator(s)

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Sep 29, 2021

Citations

No. 04-21-00299-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 29, 2021)