From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Eoff

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Apr 14, 2023
No. 13-23-00069-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2023)

Opinion

13-23-00069-CV

04-14-2023

IN RE ALAN EOFF


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Before Justices Benavides, Tijerina, and Pena

MEMORANDUM OPINION

L. ARON PEÑA JR. Justice

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case."); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

On February 21, 2023, relator Alan Eoff, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus through which he asserts that the trial court abused its discretion by issuing monetary sanctions against him, ordering a child custody evaluation report to be filed under seal, and appointing an ad litem for a minor child to serve in the dual role of guardian ad litem and attorney ad litem.

Mandamus is an extraordinary and discretionary remedy. See In re Allstate Indem. Co., 622 S.W.3d 870, 883 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836, 840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). To obtain relief by writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that an underlying order is void or is a clear abuse of discretion and there is no adequate appellate remedy. In re Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am., 494 S.W.3d 708, 712 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding); see In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The relator bears the burden of proof. See In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 840.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, the limited record provided by relator, the response filed by the real party in interest, Bonnie Williams, and the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not met his burden of proof to obtain mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.4, 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Eoff

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Apr 14, 2023
No. 13-23-00069-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2023)
Case details for

In re Eoff

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ALAN EOFF

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg

Date published: Apr 14, 2023

Citations

No. 13-23-00069-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2023)