From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dorsett

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jan 5, 2006
No. 02-05-438-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2006)

Summary

construing motion for new bond as a petition for writ of mandamus

Summary of this case from Bell v. Ray

Opinion

No. 02-05-438-CV

Delivered: January 5, 2006.

Original Proceeding.

Panel A: HOLMAN, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The court has considered relator's "Motion For New Bond" which we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus. The court is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator's "Motion For New Bond" is denied.

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

In re Dorsett

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jan 5, 2006
No. 02-05-438-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2006)

construing motion for new bond as a petition for writ of mandamus

Summary of this case from Bell v. Ray
Case details for

In re Dorsett

Case Details

Full title:IN RE LEONARD R. DORSETT, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jan 5, 2006

Citations

No. 02-05-438-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2006)

Citing Cases

Bell v. Ray

Also in our letter dated June 25, 2014, we notified Bell that to the extent his appellate brief sought…