From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re David

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 24, 2007
922 A.2d 708 (N.J. 2007)

Opinion

May 24, 2007.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-337, recommending that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14(E), DAVID WARREN DENENBERG of NEW YORK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, be reprimanded based on discipline imposed in the State of New York for violating New York Election Law § 17-122(7), conduct that in New Jersey constitutes a violation of RPC 8.4(b) (criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID WARREN DENENBERG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re David

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 24, 2007
922 A.2d 708 (N.J. 2007)
Case details for

In re David

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DAVID WARREN DENENBERG, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 24, 2007

Citations

922 A.2d 708 (N.J. 2007)
922 A.2d 708

Citing Cases

In re Soto

In 2007, on a motion for reciprocal discipline, a New Jersey attorney received a reprimand for a similar…