From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re DA Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 21, 2023
21-cv-03825-AMO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2023)

Opinion

21-cv-03825-AMO

08-21-2023

IN RE: DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT ANTITRUST LITIGATION


ORDER RE SEALING

ARACELI MARTÍNEZ-OLGUÍN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties have filed 22 administrative motions to seal related to the briefing and evidence offered in support of the pending cross-motions for summary judgment or partial summary judgment. ECF 125, 128, 129, 130, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, 139, 143, 150, 152, 155, 165, 168, 170, 171, 180, 182, 186, 187. The Court ORDERS the parties to prepare a single proposed order that brings together in a single chart all the documents or portions of documents sought to be sealed. The chart should be organized in the following format:

The Court notes that Plaintiffs withdrew their Administrative Motions to Consider Whether Asensus Surgical's (ECF 131), Ardent Health's (ECF 133), and Stryker Corporation's (ECF 136) Materials Should Be Sealed. See ECF 140.

Document or Portion of Document Sought to be Sealed

Evidence offered in Support of Sealing

Objections

Ruling

The proposed order must be filed on the docket at or before noon PT on August 31, 2023. A Word version of the proposed order must be submitted concurrently by email to amopo@cand.uscourts.gov.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re DA Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 21, 2023
21-cv-03825-AMO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2023)
Case details for

In re DA Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 21, 2023

Citations

21-cv-03825-AMO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2023)