From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Claim of Tetlow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 10, 2008
47 A.D.3d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 502760.

January 10, 2008.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 7, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Annette B. Tetlow, Plant City, Florida, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


Claimant worked as a psychiatric technician at a hospital in New York City. On July 16, 2006, she submitted a letter informing her employer that she was resigning from her position because she was relocating to Florida. Her husband, who suffers from cancer, had moved to Florida two years earlier to be closer to family. Claimant deferred her move so that she could accumulate the time needed to qualify for retirement benefits. After she left her job, she applied for unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that she was disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. "Resigning from a position in order to relocate to a warmer climate to care for an ailing spouse does not constitute good cause for leaving employment absent proof that the decision was motivated by a compelling medical necessity" ( Matter of Enriquez [Maharam Fabric Corp. — Commissioner of Labor], 42 AD3d 642, 643 [citations omitted]; see Matter of Montag [Commissioner of Labor], 37 AD3d 965, 965). Here, while claimant testified that she moved to Florida to care for her husband, she conceded that other family members provided for his needs in her absence and she did not receive medical advice to leave her job. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision that claimant left her job for personal and noncompelling reasons.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Claim of Tetlow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 10, 2008
47 A.D.3d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Claim of Tetlow

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ANNETTE B. TETLOW, Appellant. COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 10, 2008

Citations

47 A.D.3d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 145
849 N.Y.S.2d 351

Citing Cases

In re Claim of Lahens

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately determined that claimant had voluntarily separated from…

In the Matter of the Claim of Maryann Bastien

We affirm. Relocating to retire with and care for one's spouse does not constitute good cause for leaving…