From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Enriquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 5, 2007
42 A.D.3d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 501964.

July 5, 2007.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 6, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Alexandrin Enriquez, Spring Hill, Florida, appellant pro se.

Clifton, Budd DeMaria, L.L.P., New York City (George F. Brenlla of counsel), for Maharam Fabric Corporation, respondent.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur.


Claimant worked as a fabric cutter for a wholesale fabric distributor for over 31 years. In September 2005, he submitted a letter of resignation indicating that he was leaving his job for personal reasons. His decision was motivated by his desire to move to Florida to be with his spouse, who found the warmer climate therapeutic for her medical condition, and to be closer to family. Although he applied for unemployment insurance benefits, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that he was disqualified from receiving them because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. Resigning from a position in order to relocate to a warmer climate to care for an ailing spouse does not constitute good cause for leaving employment absent proof that the decision was motivated by a compelling medical necessity ( see Matter of Correa [Commissioner of Labor], 32 AD3d 1090, 1090-1091; Matter of Uemura [Lenge Rest.Commissioner of Labor], 308 AD2d 632). Here, it is undisputed that claimant resigned from his position so that he could move to Florida to be with his wife and near his family even though no proof was submitted that the move was medically necessary due to his wife's condition. Consequently, substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that claimant left his job for personal and noncompelling reasons.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Enriquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 5, 2007
42 A.D.3d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

In re Enriquez

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of AJLEXANDRIN ENRIQUEZ, Appellant. MAHARAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 5, 2007

Citations

42 A.D.3d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5819
839 N.Y.S.2d 323

Citing Cases

In the Matter of the Claim of Maryann Bastien

We affirm. Relocating to retire with and care for one's spouse does not constitute good cause for leaving…

In re Perez

We affirm. "Resigning because of a relocation undertaken for purely personal reasons does not constitute good…