From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Care and Treatment of Rainey

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 24, 2021
2021-UP-053 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-053

02-24-2021

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Mark Rainey a/k/a Mark Raney, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-001974

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and Mark Rainey, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted February 1, 2021

Appeal From Charleston County Roger M. Young, Sr., Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and Mark Rainey, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Care and Treatment of Rainey

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 24, 2021
2021-UP-053 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2021)
Case details for

In re Care and Treatment of Rainey

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Mark Rainey a/k/a Mark Raney…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 24, 2021

Citations

2021-UP-053 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2021)