From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Brown

Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana
Sep 2, 2010
No. 06-10-00158-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 2, 2010)

Opinion

No. 06-10-00158-CR

Date Submitted: September 1, 2010.

Date Decided: September 2, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Original Mandamus Proceeding.

Before MORRISS, C.J., CARTER and MOSELEY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


As best as we can understand from his rather convoluted petition for relief, Prince Brown, Jr., an inmate incarcerated in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, proceeding pro se, petitions this Court, requesting that we order the named respondent, Joe Black, the Criminal District Attorney of Harrison County, to produce and provide him with copies of the arrest offense reports from several of Brown's arrests. In order to be entitled to mandamus relief in an action such as this, "the relator must establish two essential requirements: (1) that the act sought to be compelled is purely ministerial, as opposed to discretionary or judicial in nature, and (2) no other adequate remedy at law is available." Stearnes v. Clinton, 780 S.W.2d 216, 219 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989). Brown has not provided us with a record that shows that he has made any request of the trial court to perform a nondiscretionary act. See Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Brown's petition requests relief which this Court lacks jurisdiction to grant. The petition requests relief against Black. This Court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a county attorney or a district attorney. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004). Therefore, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

Brown does not seek the arrest offense reports relating to any appeal pending before this Court.


Summaries of

In re Brown

Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana
Sep 2, 2010
No. 06-10-00158-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 2, 2010)
Case details for

In re Brown

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: PRINCE BROWN, JR

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana

Date published: Sep 2, 2010

Citations

No. 06-10-00158-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 2, 2010)

Citing Cases

In re Hoff

That jurisdiction does not extend to other parties, such as district clerks, unless such mandamus relief…

In re Bledsoe

That jurisdiction does not extend to other parties, such as district attorneys or district clerks, unless…