From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Braxton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District
May 3, 2005
583 Pa. 35 (Pa. 2005)

Summary

holding that a candidate's failure to disclose sources of rental income and the names and addresses of creditors on a statement of financial interests required removal from the ballot, per Section 1104(b)

Summary of this case from In re Guzzardi

Opinion

May 3, 2005.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 217 EAL 2005 from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 660 CD 2005 dated 04/19/2005, affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia Civil Division at No. 1407 March Term 2005.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. Respondent did not disclose anywhere on his Statement of Financial Interests the sources of his rental income and the names and addresses of the creditors holding mortgages on his rental properties. See 65 Pa.C.S. § 1105(b)(4), (b)(5). In light of these omissions, the Order of the Commonwealth Court, which allowed Respondent to amend his Statement of Financial Interests and remain on the ballot, is REVERSED, and Respondent John L. Braxton's name is ordered to be STRICKEN from the primary ballot for the Democratic Party nomination for the Office of Controller in the City of Philadelphia. See 65 Pa.C.S. § 1104(b)(3) (providing that the "[f]ailure to file the statement in accordance with the provisions of this chapter shall . . . be a fatal defect to a petition to appear on the ballot"); see also In re Nomination Petition of Benninghoff, 578 Pa. 402, 411, 852 A.2d 1182, 1187 (2004) (interpreting the fatal defect rule of Section 1104(b)(3) as permitting an amendment to a financial statement where a candidate has substantially complied with the Ethics Act, such as where all of the statutorily required disclosures "can be facially obtained from the information provided on the form as a whole").


Summaries of

In re Braxton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District
May 3, 2005
583 Pa. 35 (Pa. 2005)

holding that a candidate's failure to disclose sources of rental income and the names and addresses of creditors on a statement of financial interests required removal from the ballot, per Section 1104(b)

Summary of this case from In re Guzzardi

holding that a candidate's failure to disclose sources of rental income and the names and addresses of creditors on a statement of financial interests required removal from the ballot, per Section 1104(b)

Summary of this case from In re Guzzardi

reversing as contrary to Benninghoff the Commonwealth Court's decision permitting candidate to amend his Statement of Financial Interest and remain on the ballot where candidate did not disclose rental income and the names and addresses of creditors holding mortgages on his rental properties

Summary of this case from In re Nomination Petition of Littlepage

disallowing amendment of petition where candidate failed to disclose sources of rental income and names and addresses of creditors holding mortgages of rental properties

Summary of this case from In re Nominating Petition of Brady

In Braxton, the objector challenged, inter alia, Braxton's response on line 10, which listed as a source of income "rental property is held in my name."

Summary of this case from In re Deyoung
Case details for

In re Braxton

Case Details

Full title:In re Nominating Petitions of John L. BRAXTON. Objection of Alan…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District

Date published: May 3, 2005

Citations

583 Pa. 35 (Pa. 2005)
874 A.2d 1143

Citing Cases

In re Nomination of Paulmier

A three-judge panel of the Court of Common Pleas dismissed Paulmier's nomination petition and ordered his…

In re Williams

The Supreme Court concluded that the Ethics Act and the Pennsylvania Election Code (Election Code), Act of…