Opinion
No. 04-18-00506-CR
08-01-2018
IN RE Christopher T. BRADY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Original Mandamus Proceeding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 559662, styled The State of Texas v. Christopher T. Brady, pending in County Court 8, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Celeste Brown presiding.
Relator filed a "Writ for Violation on [sic] Defendant's Constitutional Amendment Rights," in which he asks that "a Higher Court" review his case and that he be released from confinement. Relator is represented by court-appointed trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator's pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court's review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM Do not publish