Relator, Larry L. Gray, has filed a pro se motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus. He is charged by indictment with possession of a controlled substance.

Relator seeks the writ of mandamus so that "the validity of a warrantless arrest with no probable cause justifying arrest be ruled upon to determine if further prosecution of relator may be continued." Relator is represented by appointed counsel in the trial court. Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex.Crim.App. 1981).

Accordingly, we overrule relator's motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus.

Summaries of

Gray v. Shipley

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston, First District

Apr 21, 1994

877 S.W.2d 806 (Tex. App. 1994)

denying mandamus relief to pro se relator represented by counsel in the trial court

Summary of this case from In re Rice

denying mandamus where petitioner represented by counsel

Summary of this case from In re Bledsoe

denying leave to file pro se petition for writ of mandamus where relator was represented by counsel

Summary of this case from In re Harrison

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Pete

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Gipson

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and was not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Shannon

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Hermis

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Shannon

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Scott

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Alexander

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Rodriguez

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Guillory

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Cole

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and was not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Estrada

overruling pro se motion for leave to file mandamus petition because relator was represented by appointed trial counsel and was not entitled to hybrid representation

Summary of this case from In re Carl

Gray v. Shipley

Summary

Opinion

OPINION

Gray v. Shipley

Gray v. Shipley

Case Details

Citations

Citing Cases

Gray v. Shipley

Summary

Opinion

OPINION

Gray v. Shipley

Gray v. Shipley

Case Details

CitationsCopy Citation

Citing Cases

Citations