In re Bogart

Full title: In re: Peter D. BOGART, Debtor. v. California Coastal Commission; et al.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 18, 2002

31 F. App'x 514 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

31 Fed.Appx. 514 (9th Cir. 2002) In re: Peter D. BOGART, Debtor. Peter D. Bogart, Appellant, v. California Coastal Commission; et al., Appellees. No. 00-35992. BAP Nos. OR-99-1691-KMaB OR-00-1367-KMaB OR-00-1382-KMaB. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 18, 2002

Submitted March 11, 2002 ^*.

* Because this panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument, we deny Bogart's request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Klein, Marlar and Brandt, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding.

Before CANBY, BEEZER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Peter D. Bogart appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction Bogart's appeals of the bankruptcy court's interlocutory orders. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Allen v. Old Nat'l Bank (In re Allen), 896 F.2d 416, 418 (9th Cir.1990) (per curiam).

We grant Bogart's motion to file a late reply brief. The Clerk shall file the reply brief received on December 28, 2001.

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

DISMISSED.