From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ardizzone

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Mar 17, 2021
No. 04-21-00082-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 17, 2021)

Opinion

No. 04-21-00082-CV

03-17-2021

IN RE Sarah ARDIZZONE and Antonino Ardizzone, Relators


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Original Proceeding PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021-CI-04160, styled In the Matter of T.S.A. and T.G.A., Minor Children, pending in the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. presiding.

Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We have the power to issue writs of mandamus when "agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs." TEX. GOV'T CODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record showing "the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists." In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., L.P., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Having reviewed the petition and documents included in the appendix, we conclude relators have not satisfied their burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion for temporary relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

This court previously denied the petition and motion by an administrative order on March 9, 2021. --------

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

In re Ardizzone

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Mar 17, 2021
No. 04-21-00082-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 17, 2021)
Case details for

In re Ardizzone

Case Details

Full title:IN RE Sarah ARDIZZONE and Antonino Ardizzone, Relators

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Mar 17, 2021

Citations

No. 04-21-00082-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 17, 2021)