From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Anthony Peluso

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 26, 2009
914 N.E.2d 1003 (N.Y. 2009)

Opinion

No. 182.

Argued August 25, 2009.

Decided August 26, 2009.

APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, entered August 19, 2009. The Appellate Division (1) reversed, on the law, a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered in a proceeding pursuant to, among other things, CPLR article 78, which had granted the petitions in part and issued an injunction; (2) dismissed the petitions in their entirety; and (3) vacated the injunction.

Matter of Peluso v Erie County Independence Party, 65 AD3d 820, reversed.

John Ciampoli, Albany, for appellants.

Jerome D. Schad, Williamsville, Cantor, Lukasik, Dolce, Panepinto, Buffalo ( Sean Cooney of counsel), and Cheryl A. Green, County Attorney (Kristin Klein Wheaton of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Petitioners brought this proceeding pursuant to the Election Law, the General Associations Law and CPLR article 78, seeking, among other things, a declaration that respondent Erie County Committee of the Independence Party's rules are invalid and contrary to the rules of the State Committee of the Independence Party, as well as an injunction. The State Committee cross-petitioned, joining in petitioners' request for declaratory relief.

The Appellate Division erred in granting summary judgment on the ground that the declaration sought is an advisory opinion ( 65 AD3d 820). A declaratory judgment action is an appropriate vehicle to establish and promulgate the rights of parties on a particular subject matter, including determining the parties' rights under state and local party rules ( see e.g. Matter of Conroy v State Comm. of Independence Party of N.Y., 10 NY3d 896).

Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted to that court for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal.

In per curiam opinion.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

In re Anthony Peluso

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 26, 2009
914 N.E.2d 1003 (N.Y. 2009)
Case details for

In re Anthony Peluso

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY PELUSO et al., Appellants, v. ERIE COUNTY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Aug 26, 2009

Citations

914 N.E.2d 1003 (N.Y. 2009)
914 N.E.2d 1003
886 N.Y.S.2d 86
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6304

Citing Cases

Peluso v. Erie County Indep. Party

October 2, 2009. Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Erie County…

In the Matter of N.Y. State Comm. of the Independence Party v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections

Presently before us is a dispute between various actors representing the New York State Independence Party…